Jottings By An Employer's Lawyer |
Thursday, July 13, 2006
First Burlington Northern v. White Reversal
Here the complaining employee was first suspended, then terminated, but later reinstated with 70% backpay. The district court had held this did not rise to the level of an actionable adverse action. It is fitting that the 6th Circuit got to be the first to use Burlington Northern since it was the court from which the case came. Still today's decision is not that big a deal, since the 6th Circuit in its own Burlington Northern opinion had held that termination, with later reinstatement at 100% backpay was an actionable adverse action. Thus the Supreme Court decision did not alter the result. The more important first use of Burlington Northern will be the case where the ultimate outcome is changed by the Supreme Court's action -- that decision is forthcoming -- stay tuned. Labels: retaliation
Comments:
Post a Comment
|
|
![]() |
WWW Jottings |