Jottings By An Employer's Lawyer

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Drivers Turn for MDV's


Trouble for package companies was bi-coastal in the month of May as juries in Florida and California rendered large verdicts.


  • John Thigpen, a 40 year old former driver for UPS won $669,000 in economic and $5.3 million in non-compensatory damages by a Fort Lauderdale jury in a workers compensation retaliation claim. According to a story now posted on a Teamsters website, two things seem to bother the jury -- an email directing that managers "target" employees with repeated workplace injuries for termination. Thigpen had 7 during his career at UPS. The ground given by the company for his termination was dishonesty, an issued played up by his attorney, "terminating Thigpen for dishonesty, UPS branded him with a 'Scarlet Letter' that made him unable to find a new job with a similar salary. See Jury Awards $6 Million to UPS Driver Who Alleged Retaliation for Filing Claim.

    Update: The trial court has granted a new trial, finding the jury's decision influenced by "passion or prejudice." See report here.

  • The headlines was even worse from the Bay area, California Jury Awards $50 Million In Punitive Damages, Above $11 Million In Compensatory Damages, to Arab-American FedEx Drivers. The suit filed by two independent contractors was one of the first suits tried under a California statute extending civil rights protection to independent contractors as well as employees. The drivers alleged that they had been harassed because of their Arabic background before 9/11.

    Update: The trial court substantially reduced the verdict, but did enter a judgment for $12 million. See the update.

As alternatives to U.S. Mail have grown, maybe the affection for the local mailman has been transferred to the new breed of delivery drivers. You could make a pretty good case for that proposition from these two results.

Labels:


Comments: Post a Comment

An Affiliate of the Law.com Network


From the Law.com Newswire

[about RSS] Law.com Privacy Policy
Google
WWW Jottings