Jottings By An Employer's Lawyer |
Tuesday, December 06, 2005
7th Circuit Overturns Local Government Mandated Labor Peace Agreements
The County sought to rely on its spending power to validate its ordinance. Unfortunately, they ran into the Judge Posner buzz-saw. First, he looked behind the holding in Wisconsin Dept. of Industry, Labor & Human Relations v. Gould, Inc., 475 U.S. 282, 290-91 (1986), for this key principle: the spending power may not be used as a pretext for regulating labor relations. Having established this principle, Judge Posner then systematically dismantles the one argument offered by the County in defense of its ordinance -- the need to protect the county against work stoppages. In the end he has no problem reaching this conclusion: On the contrary, we have seen that labor-peace agreements might well increase the frequency of service interruptions. The claim that the County is requiring labor peace agreements in order to further its interest as a buyer of services cannot withstand scrutiny. On this record, it is a pretext to regulate the labor relations of companies that happen, perhaps quite incidentally, to do some County work.The pre-emption argument was supported by an amicus brief filed by the NLRB, authorized by a 3-2 vote of the Board. And a huge thank you to Mike Cernovich at Crime and Federalism for his instructions on properly linking to 7th Circuit opinions. Hopefully for the benefit of future readers, I got it right.
Comments:
Post a Comment
|
|
![]() |
WWW Jottings |